4 title: "How to talk about copyright?"
7 How to talk about copyright?
8 ============================
10 In the copyright debate, it doesn't only matter what we say, but also
11 how we do it. Language frames the discussion. Thus it is necessary to
12 understand the words we use, their context, and the way they are used
13 by others. It may happen that we win this or that battle in the
14 copyright war, but if we allow the industry to shape the language
15 we think in, the entire war will be lost.
17 Words are not neutral. They have meanings and connotations. They
18 influence our perception of the world, they make ideas meaningful, they
19 shape social practices and the law. It might even be said that words are
20 more dangerous than arms. It's hard to disagree. For the last 100 years
21 or so, the language of the copyright debate was shaped by the industry
22 and hardly resisted. There was not much independent insight. Now, most
23 of basic terminology introduced into copyright debate undermines the
24 rights of the public and supports the interests of a small group of
25 beneficiaries: words like "intellectual property", "piracy" or "legal
26 access" rule the debate and influence its course. The current state of
27 the law would be different, if we had been using terms like
28 "intellectual monopoly", "infringement" and "users rights" in the past
29 instead. Policy makers and industry lobbyists try to impose their
30 language onto the minds of the people. And what we do? We surrender.
31 Scholars and copyfighters seem careless in their choice of words. We
32 intend to change that. We intend to make you think about the meaning of
33 words and influence your speaking habits. You may disagree with some or
34 all of our opinions. However, we will be more than happy if we make you
35 think more critically, consciously and carefully while using copyright